Investigation of Personality Traits, Dark Triad and Aggression in the Context of Impostor Phenomenon in University Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35365/eass.24.1.04

Keywords:

Impostor Phenomenon, Personality Traits, Dark Triad, Aggression

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine personality traits, dark triad and aggression in the context of impostor phenomenon in university students. The population of this study consists of university students studying in the Republic of Turkey and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. A total of 278 university students, 66.2% (n=184) female and 33.8% (n=94) male, studying at universities in the Republic of Turkey and TRNC in the academic year 2021-2022 were included in the study by snowball sampling method, also known as chain referral sampling. Impostor Phenomenon Scale, Ten-item Personality Scale, Aggression Inventory, Abbreviated Dark Triad Scale and socio-demographic information form were used as data collection tools in the study. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), a statistical program used in social sciences, was used to analyze the data. As a result of the study, it was found that there was a positive relationship between subjective forgery and Machiavellianism, narcissism and psychopathy. It was concluded that Machiavellianism and psychopathy were positively related to forgery against others. It was concluded that openness to experience, emotional stability, conscientiousness personality traits were positively related to subjective dishonesty. It was found that emotional stability, conscientiousness, and extraversion personality traits were positively related to falsification towards others. It was found that those with subjective forgery exhibited physical, impulsive and general aggression more than those without. It was revealed that those who were dishonest with others had more impulsive, aggression-avoidant and general aggression than those who were not. It was concluded that those who were subjective and dishonest with others had more Machiavellianism and psychopathy traits than those who were not. The results of the study were discussed with the related literature and recommendations were made.        

 

Author Biographies

Zihniye Okray, European University of Lefke

Prof. Dr. Psychology Department, Arts and Science Faculty, European University of Lefke, TRN Cyprus, e-mail: zokray@eul.edu.tr, Orcid id: 0000-0002-9117-4991

Ece Emre Müzzin, Cyprus Science University

Assoc. Prof. Cyprus Science Univesty, Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, TRN Cyprus, e-mail: ecemuezzin@csu.edu.tr, Orcid id: 0000-0002-5496-8813

References

Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023295

Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, L. R. (2007). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. The Sage handbook of social psychology, 259-287.

Atak, H. (2013). On-Maddeli Kişilik Ölçeği'nin Türk Kültürü'ne Uyarlanması. Archives of Neuropsychiatry/Noropsikiatri Arsivi, 50(4), 312-319.

https://acikerisim.kku.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12587/13777/889ff232-91e3-4a47-ac9b-8762b5fc2c54.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Babbie, E. R. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.

Buran, A., Balkır, F., & Okray, Z. (2019). Tturkish validity and reliability of the state ımpostor case scale. in wıth International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, (pp. 434-435). Turkey: Anı Publishing.

Barlett, C. P., & Anderson, C. A. (2012). Direct and indirect relations between the Big 5 personality traits and aggressive and violent behavior. Personality And İndividual Differences, 52(8), 870-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.029

Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 219-229. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1998-04530-016

Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2009). Can ‘risky’ impulsivity explain sex differences in aggression?. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 402-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.006

Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006

Clance, P. R., & O'Toole, M. A. (1987). The Imposter Phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 6(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V06N03_05

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopath: towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171

Çelik, H & Otrar, M. (2009). Saldırganlık Envanterinin (Aggression Inventory) Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 29, 101-120. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maruaebd/issue/370/2120

Dena M., Sharon A., Autumn L., Divya K., Katie T., Dani M., Ross S., Kevin O. & Heather K. (2019). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252-1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1

Fahira, U. D., & Hayat, B. (2021). Impostor Phenomenon on First and Second-year College Students. ‎‎‎ TAZKIYA: Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v9i2.19449

Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An introduction. In complete psychological works. London: Hogarth Press.

Fujie, R. (2010). Development of the state impostor phenomenon scale. Japanese Psychological Research, 52, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00417.x

Gladue B. A., (1994). Measures for clinical practice. Asourcebook, Vol. 2 Adults (4th ed.).

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

Johnson, T. P. (2014). Snowball sampling: introduction. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720

Jonason, P.K., & Webster, G.D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265

Jonason, P. K., & McCain, J. (2012). Using the HEXACO model to test the validity of the Dirty Dozen measure of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 935-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.010

Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021

Kaur, T., & Jain, N. (2022). Relationship Between Impostor Phenomenon and Personality Traits: A Study on Undergraduate Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(11), 734-746. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/14030

Kaufman, S. B., Weiss, B., Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2020). Clinical correlates of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism: A personality perspective. Journal of personality disorders, 34(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2018_32_384

Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

McHoskey, J. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 77(3), 757–759. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.7

McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192

Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H. ve Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070

Okray, Z. (2020). Kişilik: Tanımı, sınıflamaları ve kişilik bozuklukları. İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınları.

Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J.F., Jonason, P.K., & Ardıç, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T), Short Dark Triad (SD3-T), and Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

Rosenstein, A., Raghu, A., & Porter, L. (2020, February). Identifying the prevalence of the impostor phenomenon among computer science students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 30-36).

Sonnak, C., & Towell, T. (2001). The impostor phenomenon in British University students: Relationships between self-esteem, mental health, parental rearing style and socioeconomic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 863– 874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00184-7

Yaşlıoğlu-Toplu, D. ve Atılgan, Ö. (2018). Karanlık Üçlü Ölçeği: Türkçe’ye uyarlama, güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3): 725-739. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.435604

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Okray, Z., & Müzzin, E. E. (2024). Investigation of Personality Traits, Dark Triad and Aggression in the Context of Impostor Phenomenon in University Students. European Archives of Social Sciences, 1(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.35365/eass.24.1.04